Beautiful reports, thin pipeline
Your agency shows impressive dashboards. But when you look into the CRM, you see three open opportunities. That doesn't add up.
Three models, three promises, three price tags. Before you commit: which one actually produces pipeline? The honest comparison -- without the sales spin.
Your agency shows impressive dashboards. But when you look into the CRM, you see three open opportunities. That doesn't add up.
Q1 missed. Q2 missed. And every time they say: "We just need one more month." Eventually, patience runs out - but what is the alternative?
Management views marketing as a "nice-to-have" - not a pipeline driver. Because the results never measurably translate into revenue.
A structured, systematic engineering approach to comparing all three models with real numbers, typical risks, and a recommendation tailored to your situation.
Team size, current budget, and growth target - that is all we need from you.
You get a bespoke comparison of all three models with costs, risks, and a pipeline forecast.
Use the decision matrix to make a choice based on numbers rather than gut feeling.
External experts, monthly retainer, proven processes
Own employees, full control, high fixed costs
Hybrid: strategic leadership + operational team, flexibly scalable
You get an honest analysis of all three models - including the downsides that nobody else tells you.
Not just agency fees or salaries, but all hidden costs: tools, onboarding, management overhead, and vacancy risks.
Depending on team size, budget, and growth phase, you receive a concrete recommendation on which model suits you best.
You will see how much pipeline you can realistically expect from each model - and in what timeframe.
Every model has risks. You will learn what they are and how to minimise them before you commit.
This comparison is for B2B decision-makers facing the question: do we build marketing in-house, stick with an agency - or is there a third way?
Agency, in-house, or RevOps - get the honest comparison and make a decision based on numbers.